YUQORI MALAKALI FIZIKA VA MATEMATIKA FANLARI MUTAXASSISLARINI TAYYORLASHDA KOMPETENSIYAGA ASOSLANGAN YONDASHUV
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65164/cxq57z91Ключевые слова:
Kompetensiyaga asoslangan yondashuv, fizika va matematika ta’limi, matematik modellashtirish, eksperimental tadqiqot, SEM tahlii, ilmiy kompetensiyalarАннотация
Ushbu maqolada O‘zbekiston oliy ta’lim muassasalarida fizika va matematika mutaxassislarini tayyorlash jarayonida kompetensiyaga asoslangan yondashuvning samaradorligi tahli qilinadi. Tadqiqot 2022-2024 yillarda 6 ta oliy ta’lim muassasasida 425 nafar talaba ishtirokida olib borilgan bo‘lib, unda kompetensiyaga asoslangan yondashuv an’anaviy o‘qitishga nisbatan sezilarli darajada yuqori natija berishini ko‘rsatdi. Matematik modellashtirish, fizik eksperimentlar, ma’lumotlar tahlii va ilmiy tadqiqot ko‘nikmalari 25-40% ga oshgan. Struktur tenglamalar modellash (SEM) va ko‘p guruhli konfirmator faktor tahlii natijalari kompetensiyalar bilan kasbiy ko‘nikmalar o‘rtasida kuchli bog‘liqlik mavjudligini ko‘rsatdi (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.04).
Библиографические ссылки
1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2019). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing.
Pearson.
2. Baker, E. L. (2020). Educational assessment in the 21st century. Springer.
3. Cantor, P., & Sands, D. (2022). Competency-based education: Challenges and opportunities.
International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 55-68.
4. Cohen, J. (2018). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
5. Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage.
6. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to
achievement. Routledge.
7. Kline, R. B. (2022). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
8. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2021). Structural equation models of latent interactions.
Psychological Methods.
9. Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
10. Mislevy, R. J. (2018). Sociocognitive foundations of educational measurement. Routledge.
11. National Research Council. (2022). Education for life and work: Developing transferable
knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
12. Pellegrino, J. W. (2021). Assessment of science learning in the 21st century. Science Education.783
13. Porter, A. C. (2019). Measuring the content of instruction. Educational Researcher.
14. Ravitch, D. (2020). The death and life of the great American school system. Basic Books.
15. Shavelson, R. J. (2018). On an approach to testing and modeling competence. Educational
Psychologist.
16. Shepard, L. A. (2019). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher.
17. Stiggins, R. J. (2020). The perfect assessment system. ASCD.
18. Wiliam, D. (2021). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
19. Wilson, M. (2018). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Routledge.
20. Zhao, Y. (2022). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Corwin
Press.
