CLASSIFICATION OF IDIOMS WITH PROPER NAMES

Mualliflar

  • Madaminov Jaloliddinkhuja Second year master student at University of Tashkent for Applied Sciences, Gavhar Str. 1, Tashkent 100149, Uzbekistan Muallif
  • Bobojonova Shakhnoza PhD, The Department of foreign languages and literature at University of Tashkent for Applied Science , Gavhar str. 1 ,Tashkent 100149, Uzbekistan Muallif

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65164/g5vm4072

Kalit so‘zlar:

idioms, proper names, onomastic component, phraseology, classification, anthroponyms, toponyms, linguoculture, translation, English–Uzbek

Abstrak

This article presents a publishable, research-oriented classification of idioms containing proper names (also referred to as phraseological units with an onomastic component). The main purpose is to build a clear framework that can be used for corpus compilation, linguocultural interpretation, and contrastive studies (especially English–Uzbek). Drawing on phraseological scholarship available through Google Scholar, the paper argues that a single-label taxonomy (only “anthroponym” or only “toponym”) is not sufficient because proper names in idioms carry structural, etymological, cognitive, and cultural information simultaneously. Therefore, a multi-parameter model is proposed, combining: (1) onomastic type (anthroponyms, toponyms, ethnonyms, mythonyms, bibliconyms, etc.), (2) structural form (simple name, genitive pattern, derivative adjective, compound, comparative pattern), (3) source domain / origin (Bible, mythology, literature, history, popular culture), and (4) discourse function (evaluative, prototypical, allusive, identitymarking). The model is supported by contrastive evidence from English–Slovene phraseology, where idioms with onomastic components are frequently culture-specific and require special treatment in translation and lexicography.The article concludes with a practical classification template suitable for dissertation-level corpus annotation 

Havolalar

1. Cowie, A. P. (Ed.). (1998). Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford University

Press.

2. Dobrovol’skij, D., & Piirainen, E. (2022). Figurative Language: Cross-Cultural and CrossLinguistic Perspectives (2nd rev. & updated ed.). De Gruyter Mouton.

3. Vrbinc, A., & Vrbinc, M. (2014). Phraseological units with onomastic components: The case of

English and Slovene. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 52(1), 133–153.

4. Vrbinc, M. (2016). English phraseological units with an onomastic element and their translation

equivalents in Slovene. [Journal/Proceedings; PDF].

5. Gaybullayeva, D. F. (2023). The use of proper names in Uzbek phraseonomastics: A

comprehensive classification. Scholar (Uzbekistan State World Languages University).

Yuklab olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2025-12-29